Responsive Web Design 101

responsive-design-crop Four years after Ethan Marcotte coined the phrase in his seminal article on A List Apart, responsive design is recognized by web designers not as just the way of the future, but as an essential technique for the present. But while we designers all agree on this, we often fail at the most basic needs of any new technique: explanation and advocacy.

What is responsive web design?

If you’re still unclear on what responsive web design is after reading that first paragraph, it’s a perfect example of the way in which designers sometimes fall short. Responsive Web Design is the practice of designing a single website which intelligently adapts to various screen sizes. From this brief explanation, let me give a demonstration: we recently created a website for our client Host & Keane. If you pull it up on your smartphone or tablet, elements on the page reflow to maintain their hierarchy, but better fit on the different screen sizes. This is the core of this technique.

Why do it?

Now that we’ve got a clearer picture of what responsive design is, the question is: “why do this?” Well, first of all, when we build websites that are semantic, with a clear hierarchy, adding responsiveness to that isn’t incredibly difficult. Sure, it’s additional work, but if the site is well-built, it’s not overwhelming. So that’s “why not,” but again, “why?” The fact is, since modern smartphones came on the scene (ushered in by the iPhone in 2007) mobile web use has exploded. Even on our decidedly non-responsive agency website, over the past six months, nearly 50% of our traffic came from mobile visitors. Now you’re probably thinking, “Great! If your site is seeing such a high percentage of mobile traffic, clearly this technique isn’t necessary!” But the real picture isn’t so rosy. While desktop visitors on average spend nearly 3 minutes on our site, and visit 6.5 pages; mobile visitors seem to get quickly frustrated, as they leave (on average) before 30 seconds, visiting 1.3 pages. Now the Host & Keane site gets a lot less mobile visitors as a percentage of its total traffic, but of those it does get, they visit only slightly less pages than desktop visitors, and they spend time more in line with what desktop visitors do. As an agency, this is an area where we are constantly working to improve, but for the time being, I hope you’ll come away from this with a better understanding of what responsive design is, and why it’s necessary as a part of your web strategy.

48 Significant Social Media Facts, Figures and Statistics Plus 7 Infographics

Written by Jeff Bullas
I came across some interesting statistics that has me quite concerned about the dental hygiene levels on this planet.
Apparently there are 600 million more people that own a mobile phone compared to those who own a toothbrush.

Some research reveals that there are 4.8 billion mobile users but only 4.2 billion people with a toothbrush.

Does that mean that every mobile should be sold with a free toothbrush or should you need to produce your toothbrush before you are given possession of your new mobile phone to ensure that future personal close encounters are engaging and pleasant?

Another interpretation of those statistic is that toothbrushes are too expensive.

Read the entire story at- www.jeffbullas.com

Substantial Growth in Ads Is on the Way to Facebook

By TANZINA VEGA, NY Times
Published: February 29, 2012

Facebook’s hundreds of millions of users could soon be faced with a lot more advertising — in their newsfeed, on their mobile devices and even when they log off.

On Wednesday, the company announced a new suite of advertising products intended to insert more ads into Facebook’s traditionally clean interface and to take more advantage of mobile ads, where the company has struggled. The announcement was made at its first marketing conference, held at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan.

For users, the announcement could mean many more ads on Facebook. For advertisers, the effort offers a chance to reach more users in more places.

Despite aggressively courting Madison Avenue for the last few years, Facebook has been an anomaly in the world of digital advertising. The ad units offered less creative options for advertisers who want to, say, take over the site’s home page or add moving text to an ad. Rather, the value in Facebook’s ads was in their data and personalization.

The potential for more ad dollars was reflected in the company’s first filing for a public offering in February. At the time, analysts said the company was expected to be valued at $75 billion to $100 billion. But according to the filing, Facebook made only $3.7 billion in revenue last year, the bulk of that from advertising.

Read the Full Story at New York Times